Types of Defective Product Liability Claims
A product liability claim may arise on several grounds, each having some similar and certain different scopes of claiming damages. Understanding these stipulations is vital to making a valid claim and presenting the case in court successfully. The broad categories of defective and dangerous products liability claims are:
• Defectively manufactured products: These products are flawed as a result of some unintended error in manufacturing them, such as an error at the factory where the product was fabricated. A claim in this case is subject to strict liability of the court; wherein, if proven guilty, the manufacturers have to pay-off maximum damages.
• Defectively designed products: A case against such product typically involves a claim against the entire line of products, and not just an accusation against a single mishap or error. A plaintiff is typically required to identify a safer alternative for designing the product to claim damages in this case.
• Defects in warnings or instructions: This entails a failure to furnish adequate instructions for proper usage of the product, resulting in injury. It must be noted that a warning must be explicit, specific and conspicuously placed, such that it can be easily spotted.
Finally, bear in mind that, regardless of its nature, a claim will only be valid when it is proved that the product is defective or dangerous and that defect/hazard has resulted in the injury.
The Case of Unavoidable Unsafe Product
While raising a product liability claim, the case of an “unavoidably unsafe” product is likely to arise. An unavoidably unsafe product is one that is not necessarily dangerous, but one that cannot be made completely safe. Medical devices and prescription drugs are examples of products, which have some level of risk inherent in them. One can make a product liability claim even on these products in the following cases:
• Manufacturing errors, wherein the product is proven to be adulterated
• Marketing lapses, which entails a lack of adequate warning or instructions
• Lack of alternatives, which implies that the product has a superior alternative that serves its purpose with lower risks.
To better understand these and other exceptions of product liability laws, hire a reliable and reputed attorney. Solomon Neuhardt, a Member of the American Association for Justice, is one of the most trusted names in personal injury and product liability laws in Montana.
|